Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Claire Laporte's avatar

Dickens never seemed to understand why people might feel resentful about being treated as freaks or grotesques. While Quilp does clearly resent it, Dickens does not use his embitterment (to the point of evil) as a lesson on the evil effects of creating freak shows. He creates them himself in almost every novel -- in Pickwick, it's the fat boy, who is dehumanized and treated as an object. Later, it's characters like Mrs. Gamp.

Expand full comment
Bren's avatar

This was a delight - so much to enjoy. I'm also starting to make links to other Dickens' works.

But first: when Codlin and Short started, was anybody else reminded of the fox and the cat in 'Pinocchio' (the Disney version)?

The woman in the carriage: I read that differently. I assumed she was an older woman (mother or grandmother), surrounded by young people. I always think the best of people...

The similarities to other works: long walk (David Copperfield), child in danger (Oliver Twist), run into actors (Nicholas Nickleby), child taken in by good people (Oliver Twist / David Copperfield). Kit feels like a respectable version of the Artful Dodger, and all the shenanigans are bringing Ralph Nickleby to mind.

I'm not complaining, I'm interested in how the themes play out differently.

I've got the Folio Society edition which has different - but equally brilliant - illustrations (especially Quilp with the dog).

At this point - although I'm sure we'll find out later - I'm intrigued by the novel's title. So, why does it take its name from the shop? What is the significance? I'm starting to make wild guesses.

I loved the expression (about Quilp) "this unknown piece of ugliness". I may try to popularised it. -

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts