Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bren's avatar

This section really did for my blood pressure. It started with real comedy (Dolly asserting herself about Stepan's debts) that turns so quickly into tragedy.

The way Tolstoy describes how Anna sees everything negatively is brilliant - it sounds like the narrator's voice, but it's clearly Anna's perspective. Anna's assumption that everyone is talking about her - judging her - comes over clearly.

And the way we gradually enter Anna's mind and can follow her thought process is heartbreaking. There are so many ways Anna could have been saved - by Stepan, by Karenin, by Vronsky, by a random stranger at the station - but she is alone.

I'd always assumed that Anna died at a main railway station - somewhere a bit grand - rather than a provincial pitstop. But it does seem.right that Anna ends her life away from society that has neglected her.

I hadn't realised that Anna wouldn't make it to the last book, so I'm eager to see what that has in store.

Kristine Benoit de Bykhovetz's avatar

Some early thoughts: ten pages into The Age of Innocence and the social rigidity already feels oppressive enough to understand why Scorsese called it “the most violent film I have ever made.” Strangely, it keeps making me think of American Psycho: different eras, opposite tones, but a similar obsession with prescribed behaviour and the quiet brutality of social expectation.

Not in terms of explicit violence, of course, but in the way both books anatomise social life through obsessive description.

I don’t think it’s accidental that these stories unfold in New York. Across different periods, the city functions less as a setting than as a system that produces and enforces social behaviour.

35 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?